|
SARS will
be eradicated
David Baltimore
We in the
U.S. are lucky: somehow we have so far dodged the bullet of SARS. If an
infected traveler from China had come here and silently initiated a chain
of infection, we could have had the problem that faced Canada. As it is,
we can safely go about our lives with much less danger from SARS than
we face daily in our automobiles.
It is ironic
that Americans and, even more, Europeans, worry about genetically engineered
plants and animals, but it is the natural organisms from the wild that
pose the greatest threat. We plan for a biowarfare attack, but our preparations
serve us best to counter dangers that are a part of the normal microbial
world. If it sounds like we are misjudging our enemies, that is a possibility
worth pondering.
We still
have no idea where SARS came from. It seems pretty clear that it is due
to a member of the family of coronaviruses. Somewhere in nature, there
must be a species that passes the SARS virus around, just as we pass around
the common cold viruses among ourselves. We may never identify that species
because such a virus generally causes mild symptoms. Imagine looking for
a sneezing squirrel or a diarrheic rabbit. Actually, you neednt
spot the virus while it is spreading in its home population because an
infection leaves telltale antibodies in the blood that can be assayed.
Also, SARS virus may well be a recombinant, an agent created by joining
parts of the genetic material of two different viruses, say, one from
a bird and one from a mouse.
The spread
of a virus from animal to humans is not a rare occurrence. One estimate
I have seen is that it happens on average once a year. But when a virus
is adapted to one species, it generally is transmitted poorly in a second
species and even if it jumps across, it usually burns itself out. Ebola
is such a virus that jumps frequently in Africa. It is daunting to realize
that although we have known about Ebola for decades, we still do not know
what species harbors it naturally.
The best-known
virus to jump species and then be passed around is HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS. It seems to have come from chimpanzees, where it causes no
known disease. It is actually not transmitted all that efficiently in
humans but we help by injecting ourselves or having unprotected sex. It
is particularly diabolical because the initial symptoms of an HIV infection
are mild and it generally takes years before the immunodeficiency becomes
evident. Thus, the virus was able to take hold in the human population
before we could establish barriers to its spread. Also, the unwillingness
of officials in many countries to face up to the routes of transmission
and counsel the population to take precautions allowed it to gain a foothold
around the world.
Will SARS
end up endemic, like HIV, or sporadic, like Ebola? I believe that we still
have a chance to put the genie back in the box. In Vietnam, they seem
to have eradicated it. Likewise in Canada. The real problems are China,
Hong Kong, and, recently, Taiwan. Hong Kong and Taiwan are small enough
that I believe they can eradicate the virus, particularly if they can
keep themselves isolated from mainland China. In China, the problem seems
much worse because they allowed so much spread before they began serious
countermeasures. But the virus is not easily transmitted: it is generally
very close contacts who get infected. So there is a chance, even for China.
In fact, if China does not want to end up isolated from the rest of the
world, it must eradicate the virus.
My confident
predictions assume that the virus will not fundamentally change by mutationor
perhaps recombine with a human coronavirusand find a more effective
route of transmission. This is not a common occurrence when a virus jumps
species, so it is not something to expect, but it could happen.
Whatever
happens, there is one lesson I hope we have learned: when a new agent
starts spreading in the human population, our first response has to be
openness, not secrecy. The spread of SARS could have been entirely avoided
if the Chinese had been open with their own population and the world when
the infection first became evident. Sure, openness can lead to overreaction.
I believe that the press has a responsibility in such circumstances to
warn the world but also to ameliorate the inevitable fear response by
putting the danger in perspective. I wrote about the responsibility of
the press in the Wall Street Journal in late April and received many letters
of thanks from people who thought the epidemic of fear accompanying the
outbreak of SARS was an overreaction.
This is not
the first and will not be the last virus to jump from an animal reservoir
to humans. These natural occurrences are as likely, and maybe more likely,
to face us than a man-made epidemic generated by a terrorist. We need
to be vigilant, then open and effective in our response if we are to avoid
replays of the SARS events. It is hard to stay vigilant when years may
pass without an incident but we need long memories and the political will
to stay the course. The moment will come when we will be thankful.
|