|
 

The team
raises obelisks with the help of a system designed by Emilio Castaño
Graff 02. As the kite pulls on the rope, the pulleys rise up. As
the tip of the obelisk is lifted, its base slides into place.
How
Many Caltechers Does It Take to Raise An Egyptian Obelisk?
The world
may soon find out.
One could
argue that there arent enough Techers on Earth to raise a modest-sized
obelisk without power equipment. After all, didnt it require thousands
of workers to put the obelisks and pyramids of ancient Egypt into place?
Maybe not.
The task
may have been accomplished by a dozen or so people flying the stones into
position with a kite. A business consultant from Reseda has proposed this
theory, and a few Techers are helping to demonstrate that its a
possibility.
This summer
the team of Techers and friends raised a three-and-a-half-ton obelisk
in 25 seconds, with reporters and cameramen documenting the feat. Now
they plan to build larger obelisks to demonstrate that even the mammoth
300-ton monuments of ancient Egyptnot to mention the far less massive
building blocks of Egypts 90-odd pyramidscould have been raised
with a fraction of the effort that modern Egyptologists have assumed.
Its
an engineering challenge, says aeronautics professor Mory Gharib, PhD
83. The idea of accomplishing heavy tasks with limited manpower
is appealing, he adds, because it makes logistical sense.
The challenge
was posed to Gharib and his colleagues two years ago by business consultant
Maureen Clemmons. In 1997 she had seen a picture in Smithsonian magazine
of a 340-ton obelisk being raised in St. Peters Square in 1586.
This feat had required 74 horses and 900 men using ropes and pulleys.
Clemmons came up with the idea that ancient Egyptian builders could have
used kites to accomplish the task more easily.
She needed
an aeronautics expert with the proper credentials to field-test her theory.
Gharib was interested. He, in turn, needed a willing undergrad who would
devote himself to the problem.
Willing undergrad Emilio Castaño Graff 02 tells the story
from his perspective.
THE UPS
AND DOWNS OF RAISING OBELISKS
I came
to Caltech as a Millikan Scholar and did my prefrosh SURF (Summer Undergraduate
Research Fellowship) with Gharib in the summer of 1998, Graff recounts.
The next summer, I decided that I wanted to do another SURF with
Mory, and it was in the spring of 1999 that Maureen Clemmons had contacted
Mory about her ideas. He suggested I work on that as a project, and I
agreed.
The
first summer was all about checking the feasibility of the whole idea
and designing a basic system. Graff and Gharib decided they would
need to build a simple structure around an obelisk with a pulley system
mounted in front of the stone. That way, the base of the obelisk would
move across the ground for a few feet as the kite lifted the stone, and
the stone would then be quite stable once it had been pulled up to a vertical
position. The top of the obelisk would be tied with ropes threaded through
the pulleys, through a braking system, and attached to the kite.
The
next summer I worked on the project again, says Graff, and
the task was to get ready for a two-ton obelisk and get more specific
on the design of the system to the point where we could put one together
and try the ideas.
By
then, two more people had joined the team. Daniel Correa, from Inca-Block
of San Diego, read about the idea in a newspaper and contacted Maureen,
offering his construction expertise. Using my drawings, he manufactured
two concrete obelisks for us that were made with rebar, or iron rods,
to strengthen the massive objects. He also helped in the setup of our
structure, and it was his workers who built the first version of it. Maureen
had also found our kite expert, Eric May, a kite surfer from Santa Barbara.
He taught me how to fly the things so that I could take one control line
and he could take the other of our large kite, which is impossible to
fly with just one person.
Graff continued
working on the project as a part-time staff member throughout the 200001
school year, conducting tests every few months. Our first field
test was in October 2000, in Tecate, Mexico, where the obelisk was built.
There was no wind, and it was a bit discouraging. On a Web site
dedicated to the projectwww.pyramidiots.orgGraff writes that,
in lieu of wind, the kite was replaced with a truck to test the structure
and the pulley system. Very slowly, the obelisk reached about 75
degrees, after which one of the pulleys seized and was ripped out of the
structure by the trucks pull. The rip in the metal caused the whole
beam to break, and the obelisk came dramatically crashing down.
The obelisk was essentially destroyed, and the initial idea to save
money on the pulleys and the structure was abandoned. The team bought
larger, more rugged pulleys, reinforced the brake, and redesigned the
structure, or scaffolding, to make it stronger and safer.
In the meantime,
the team conducted a February kite test at a new site in the Guadalupe
Sand Dunes north of Santa Barbara, California, where a steady breeze was
assured. It didnt go perfectly, but it did yield an actual
measurement that the kite could pull at least 500 pounds in 7-mile-per-hour
winds, says Graff. This gave us a boost in confidence that
it would work. Subsequent rains and the impending arrival of the
snowy plovers (birds that have priority to nest in the area) sent the
team packing. The setup was moved to Quartz Hill, near Palmdale.
Our
first field test there was also plagued by a lack of wind, says
Graff. But suspecting that the obelisk did not weigh 4,000 pounds,
we did some tests and found that in fact it weighed nearly 7,000. The
rebar had added weight that I did not factor into the size calculations.
The
next time we went we finally had wind, but Eric May was not able to make
it. With another inexperienced flier at the other end of the kite, we
lifted the obelisk after wrestling with the kite for an hour and a half
or so. The second successful field test, with Eric May and slightly stronger
winds, resulted in the obelisk being raised in just 45 seconds.
Then
on June 23, 2001, we had our first public field test, which was
well attended by members of the national press. Although the winds
were not as smooth as we would have liked, we managed to bring the obelisk
up in two tries, requiring a total of about 25 seconds of kite airtime.
The force generated by the wind actually lifted the obelisk off the ground,
where it swung for a few seconds before the team lowered it into an upright
position.
WILL THE
IDEA FLY?
One reporter,
who covered the event for The Chronicle of Higher Education, posed the
question, Does Ms. Clemmonss theory hold air? Egyptologist
Barbara Lesko answered no. Even if it is technically possible to
do this, the Egyptians left us no documentation that shows they knew of
kites or used kites, said Lesko, a research associate at Brown University.
Graff considers
the historical question from an engineers perspective. I think
that the whole kite idea is great, he says. First, it gives
more credit to the creativeness of the Egyptians. If they were smart enough
to design buildings like the pyramids so perfectly, then it just seems
wrong that they would not devote any of this intelligence to construction
methods, and that they would have everything done with human power. Aside
from that, the kite method would be much faster and less strenuous. And
it would require fewer people.
Although
there are some difficulties that we have not yet experienced with our
smaller obelisks, imagine how difficult it must be to coordinate thousands
of workers. To move their larger obelisks, weighing up to 300 tons, they
would have required at least 2,000 workers pulling on one or more parallel
ropes, and all 2,000 would have had to pull at the exact same time with
all their strength. And somehow, between pulls, they would have had to
prop the obelisk up with something so it wouldnt fall back down.
And they would have had to do this for hours or even days.
Meanwhile,
with the kite method, they would have had to fly a kite or a stack of
kites, with at the most a couple of people for each control line and a
minimal support crew to operate the brake, lubricate the pedestal as it
slid, and guide the obelisk into place. With steady winds it would not
take nearly as long and it would be much more graceful than a bunch of
Egyptian men with hernias at the end of the day.
A lot
of people say that we are wrong and that this doesnt prove the Egyptians
did it this way, Graff continues. Part of that feeling I think
is honestly not believing in our idea, while part of it is simply not
being open enough to accept the first serious theory that does not involve
thousands of workers in heavy labor for hours if not days. They are right
about the fact that we have not proved the Egyptians did it this waynot
with our obelisk one-tenth the size of the smallest Egyptian variety;
not with our nylon parafoil for a kite; not with our steel pulleys and
steel structure and braided yachting rope. But what we did is the first
step in trying to prove the Egyptians may have used this method.
ON TO
BIGGER, MORE ANCIENT THINGS
Now
that we have seen the tremendous forces that the wind can develop when
its power is properly harnessed, we will get ready to gradually downgrade
our technology to the level that the ancient Egyptians may have used,
says Graff. And we will eventually increase the size of the obelisk
until it reaches Egyptian size.
Graff himself
may be off designing race cars by that point. He plans to graduate in
a year (in engineering and applied science, with a concentration in aeronautics)
and pursue this long-held goal.
Future SURF students take note. Gharib says the team is preparing
to replace the steel scaffolding with wooden poles and the steel pulleys
with wooden pulleys like the ones they may have used on Egyptian ships.
Now that he, Graff, and cohorts have shown that a kite can raise a huge
weight, they plan to progess to a 10-ton and then perhaps a 20-ton stone.
Eventually they hope to receive permission to raise one of the 40-ton
obelisks that still lie in an Egyptian quarry. We may not even need
a kite, Gharib suggests. It could be we can get along with
just a drag chute.
|