|
Too
Hot to Handle?
As prices
at the pump have risen this year, so has the intensity of the debate over
the relative abundance of Earth’s remaining oil (an issue, David
Goodstein notes, on which reasonable people can and do differ). However
heated that discussion ultimately becomes, it has some way to go before
it reaches the level of commentary and vitriol that is routinely generated
over the related question of what impact fossil fuels are having on the
greenhouse effect, the atmospheric phenomenon that for eons has kept Planet
Earth—like Baby Bear’s cereal—neither too hot nor too
cold.
In Out of
Gas, Goodstein takes on the seemingly thankless job of distilling the
innumerable position papers, research studies, and policy debates on this
issue down to a few immutable physical facts: At 93 million miles from
the sun, Earth receives a flux of solar energy that, averaged over the
face of the planet at the top of the atmosphere, comes to 343 watts per
square meter. A portion of this energy is reflected, and the rest is absorbed
and radiated back into space as infrared radiation. For Earth to radiate
back energy equal to what it absorbs, its surface temperature would have
to be roughly zero degrees Fahrenheit. At that temperature, its surface
water would freeze, reflecting more of the sun’s light, and making
Earth an even colder and less hospitable planet.
That this
hasn’t happened is due to the fact that atmospheric trace gases—water
vapor, methane, carbon dioxide, and the other so-called greenhouse gases—absorb
infrared radiation that would otherwise escape and reradiate it both out
to space and back to Earth, warming the planet’s surface overall
to, in Goodstein’s words, a relatively “balmy, comfortable
57 degrees Fahrenheit, as a mean surface temperature. At that temperature
we evolved, climbed down from the trees and started building steam engines.”
In the preindustrial
era, Earth’s atmosphere absorbed 88 percent of the infrared radiation
that would otherwise have been radiated away. In the last 150 years, however,
that balance has been significantly altered by humans’ ever-growing
reliance on fossil fuels. Says Goodstein, “Since the beginning of
the industrial age, we have increased the amount of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere by about 30 percent.”
The net result
of this tinkering, observes Goodstein “is not easy to predict. We
don’t know exactly what would happen if by burning more fossil fuel,
particularly more coal, and increasing CO2 in the atmosphere, we were
to raise the greenhouse effect, let’s say, to 100 percent, but we
have a good model to look at. The planet Venus is a little closer to the
sun than Earth is, but the physics should permit Venus to be very earthlike
in temperature. But it’s not.Venus has a runaway greenhouse effect
and a surface temperature hotter than molten lead. As we have seen, distance
from the sun is only one of several variables that determine habitability
on Earth. At 93 million miles from the sun, our planet could be a frozen
wasteland, or it could be a Venusian inferno. The fact is that it is neither.
Instead it has this delicately balanced partial greenhouse effect that
is ideal for creatures like us. We mess with that greenhouse effect at
our peril.” -H.A.
|